Task Force Report No. #2
Success or Sellout?
The U.S.-North Korean Nuclear Accord
Richard HaassDirector
What are Task Force Reports?
CFR sponsors Task Forces to assess issues of critical importance to U.S. foreign policy to reach bipartisan consensus on policy recommendations.
Who makes them?
Task Force members aim to reach a meaningful consensus on policy and are solely responsible for the content of their report.
The U.S.-North Korean Agreed Framework of October 1994 holds the potential for resolving the Nuclear proliferation threat from the North, promoting stability on the Korean Peninsula, and furthering North-South dialogue. Yet it also could exacerbate tensions on the peninsula and introduce new problems into U.S. ties with both South Korea and Japan. The key now lies in Washington, Seoul, and Tokyo; how they manage the pact’s implementation will determine—even more than its terms—whether the accords leads to good or ill.
This report—the result of an expert bipartisan task force—traces the history of the negotiations, explains what the accord contains, what it requires from the parties, and provides responses to commonly raised questions and criticisms. It also suggests some guidelines for the United States, South Korea, and Japan as they implement the agreement—or protect themselves against its failure.
Task Force Members
Kenneth L. Adelman
Byung-Joon Ahn
Chang-Yoon Choi
Yoichi Funabashi
Leslie H. Gelb
William Gleysteen, Jr.
Donald P. Gregg
Richard N. Haass
Hong-Choo Hyun
Arnold Kanter
Kyung Won Kim
Dong-Bok Lee
Jessica Tuchman Mathews
Don Oberdorfer
Douglas H. Paul
Nicholas Platt
Sang-Woo Rhee
Robert W. RisCassi
William Y. Smith
Stephen J. Solarz
Richard H. Solomon







